Monday, April 6, 2009
Response to Kim
In response to Kim's comments, I think the way missions are handled has changed dramatically since the 1800's. I don't think their way of sending the men on missions for years and years would work too well in our day and age. I really admire not only the men for dedicating so much of their lives to preaching, but also the women who stayed home and took care of everything else - earning money, keeping the farm, keeping house, and raising all of the kids. Maybe in that sense, some of the polygamous families provided an extra support system for the women while their husbands were away. Many people probably aren't aware that after World War II, some men were called on missions after they were married. Their wives stayed home and earned money to support them. This happened with my parents; my dad had been in the war for years, and decided later on to serve a mission after his marriage. This, of course, doesn't happen any more. Some practices have to evolve with changing times.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I didn't know that men went on missions after marriage as recently as World War II. Honestly, their commitment to the Gospel was something that I don't see anymore unless I'm looking at the Quorum of the 12 and the First Presidency. I know that we're all very grateful for the Gospel in our lives and we go about doing what we're supposed to, but I don't see many people living it the way they did back then. Pretty neat.
ReplyDelete